Claim is not enforceable in the process of collective conflict according to article 70.1 of the law of social jurisdiction. Conciliation has the same effectiveness that is attributed to statutory collective agreements. It is a legal negotiation act, through which an inter-party transaction is carried out. Said agreement may not affect inalienable rights. Its main purpose is to avoid a procedure resolved by a third party other than the parties to the conflict. What really governs here is the will of the parties.
The conciliator has no other task than to bring the positions of the contenders closer together. The conciliator neither resolves the conflict nor acts as an arbitrator nor proposes a solution. Mediation this collective conflict resolution process is characterized whatsapp number list by the intervention of a third-party mediator who has broad powers of proposal and information. Its main objective is to offer a solution project that satisfies all parties. What the mediator tries is for the parties to put an end to their differences. In addition, he proposes and provides concrete solutions that satisfy both parties.
The obligation of mediation, like conciliation, is also imposed in article 63 of the law regulating social jurisdiction. It is worth mentioning that the agreement on autonomous resolution of labor conflicts (asac) establishes that mediation will be mandatory as a pre-procedural requirement for the filing of collective conflict claims before the social jurisdiction. The lawsuit can be filed by any of the parties and, therefore, it replaces the previous administrative conciliation. The six modalities of mediation in collective